Hidden Truths: Why Big Pharma Ignores Known Cancer Cures
Why do so many people believe there is no known cure for cancer, despite evidence to the contrary? Many argue that pharmaceutical companies ignore or suppress such cures for the sake of profit. Let's explore the reasons behind this practice and whether it is as dire as it seems.
Why Pharmaceutical Companies May Avoid Promoting Known Cancer Cures
Big pharmaceutical companies often refuse to promote or acknowledge known cancer cures. The primary reason for this is that these cures are non-pharmaceutical, requiring no medication or treatments. Consequently, there would be no opportunity for the companies to generate profit from their promotion or application.
For example, a cure for cancer has been known since at least 1980. However, it has not been widely advertised or utilized by big pharmaceutical companies. This is because the cure involves natural healing methods that are not profitable. In the traditional medical system, these methods are often forbidden as they do not align with the prevailing profit motives.
Western Medicine and Profit Motives
Western medicine is driven primarily by financial gain. Many argue that natural healing methods are excluded from the medical system due to their lack of profit potential. As a result, seeking treatment from a doctor might not always be the best option for those who want to explore alternative healing methods.
Many retired healthcare professionals, such as nurses and doctors, have expressed their concerns over the years. They emphasize that the best way to maintain health is to avoid frequent visits to doctors altogether. They believe that the conventional medical approach is often more harmful than beneficial due to its profit-driven nature.
In the cases of individuals who have discovered and used natural healing methods, even ethical and science-backed approaches are often dismissed or even prohibited. The ethical dilemma is further complicated by the fact that doctors who find these cures are likely to face severe consequences, including loss of medical licenses. Andrew Wakefield is a classic example of this.
The Search for Cancer Cures
Despite the lack of promotion from pharmaceutical companies, research into cancer cures is ongoing. Many see hope in the development of biologic agents that harness the body's immune system to fight cancer. This is a promising approach that aligns with the scientific understanding of cancer as a complex disease rather than a single entity.
Dr. James, my oncologist and a patient of his for three years, supports this view. He is convinced that pharmaceutical companies are not purely altruistic entities, but they do recognize the potential of new treatments to improve patient outcomes and increase their profits. The journey to finding an effective cancer cure is far from over, but with continued advances in biologic agents, the future looks more promising than ever.
Conclusion
The failure of Big Pharma to promote known cancer cures is a complex issue, rooted in profit motives and the nature of the medical industry. However, the ongoing research into biologic agents offers a glimmer of hope for the future. The quest for a cure continues, driven by ethical and scientific principles, bringing a potential solution closer to reality.
As more people become aware of these issues and the potential of natural healing methods, they may explore alternative routes to health and wellness. By staying informed and advocating for change, we can help bring about a more equitable and effective approach to cancer treatment.