Unfounded Risks: Debunking Arguments for Border Closure
Recent statements from political figures like Mike Johnson reflect an alarming trend of unfounded rhetoric against border closure. It is crucial to critically examine these claims to understand their validity and the potential impacts. This article aims to provide a balanced perspective on the arguments for and against border closure, focusing on the trade dependency, illegal immigration dynamics, and the broader economic and social implications.
Trade Dependency and Economic Impacts
Anyone who questions the economic benefits of open borders, particularly in trade, is often dismissed with derogatory language. This dismissal ignores the significant economic advantages that open borders bring. As highlighted, the United States and Mexico conducted over 800 billion dollars in trade last year. This cross-border trade is not only a financial pillar but also supports numerous jobs in red states. For instance, over 100,000 jobs in red states are dependent on this trade. Closing these borders would have severe economic repercussions, leading to job losses and reduced economic activity.
Illegal Immigration and Asylum Seekers
With President Biden in office, the issue of illegal immigration has become a contentious topic. Critics argue that the surge in illegal immigrants is due to policies that incentivize entry, such as the misused term “asylum seeker.” Indeed, close to 10 million illegals have entered the country since Biden took office. However, it is important to note that not all asylees are qualified for protection, yet they are allowed entry. This has led to an increasing number of individuals who do not meet asylum criteria but still remain in the country with a “worthless removal order.” The lack of manpower to locate and deport these individuals exacerbates the issue. Additionally, the termination of the remain in Mexico policy and the mass releases under parole authority further contribute to the backlog in the immigration court system.
Taxpayer Burden and Economic Costs
The economic burden of illegal immigration is significant. According to estimates, it costs taxpayers approximately 100 billion dollars annually. This includes the provision of social services, healthcare, and other benefits to undocumented immigrants. Another controversial point is the use of federal funds to incentivize sanctuary cities to support illegal immigrants, which further adds to the tax burden.
Security and Constitutional Concerns
Mike Johnson's comments also reflect a security and constitutional concern. The phrase "inbred ignorant racist piece of dog shit" is an example of hyperbole rather than constructive debate. It is important to address these concerns in a factual manner. Immigration policies must balance security and humanitarian considerations, ensuring that individuals seeking asylum are treated fairly and efficiently.
Conclusion
The arguments for border closure need to be grounded in factual data and long-term consequences, rather than emotional rhetoric. While there are valid concerns about illegal immigration and its economic and social impacts, these must be addressed through comprehensive policies that balance national security and economic needs. The current administration’s approach, despite its flaws, reflects an attempt to address these challenges. In November 2024, voters will have the opportunity to weigh in on the direction of the country, and it is crucial that the debate remains civil and focused on substantive issues.
Key Points to Consider
Trade Dependency: The economic importance of trade with Mexico, particularly in red states.
Asylum Seekers: The misuse of the term "asylum seeker" and the resulting backlog in the immigration court system.
Taxpayer Burden: The significant financial costs of illegal immigration and the distribution of federal funds to sanctuary cities.